Heads Up, Everyone!
LiveJournal has started snooping on outbound clicks, sliently redirecting outbound links through "outboundlink.net." This is enabled even for paid users, and the opt-out is so hidden/out of the way that what they're doing is simply unconscionable.
Here's an example link: http://www.amazon.com/Applied-Cryptogra
Javascript is used to make the url in the status bar appear normal when you hover over it, until you actually click on the link. To see that it is actually being redirected for tracking, right-click on the link and copy the url, then paste it into something like notepad.
Fortunately, there is a way to opt out:
- Open the Admin Console at http://www.livejournal.com/admin/consol
e/ - Execute the following command:
set opt_exclude_stats 1
I also recommend adding the following to your ad-blocker:
outboundlink.netoutboundlink.mel-stat.livejournal.com/js/pagestats/dRev.js l-stat.livejournal.com/js/pagestats/DR_v4u2.js
Brought to my attention by a post on DamnPortlanders.
Edit 1:
onclick and oncontextmenu, so the reason why links appear normal is that it doesn't change them until you actually click on them.If you're unclear about SUP/LJ's intent, realize that this a technique that would only be used by someone who wanted to hide the fact that they are manipulating outbound links.
Edit 2:
As posted in comments, this (for now) is only affecting links to a long but finite list of domains.It also appears to be financially motivated, as the net effect (when it isn't breaking links to crittersbythebay.com due to sloppy programming) seems to be the insertion of LJ/SUP or their Partner's referral/kickback code in the url. This finer manipulation is done on the "outboundlink.net" servers, though, instead of in the javascript.
Every click going through LJ's partner-in-crime will of course be logged by this third party, so the call-to-arms on privacy grounds still stands.
Edit 3:
To quote a post by LJ Advisory Board memberLJ was indeed redirecting about 150 urls to advertisers, even for paid users. They are now aware how Not Good an Idea that was. They're pulling that code tonight.
I'll post an update again when I know more.
*** EDIT ***marta has posted some information saying the code was supposed to add "this link came via lj" affiliate info to non affiliated links -- which makes a lot more sense (and sounds thankfully less sinister) than hijacking people's links and taking them to advertisers, but didn't work as expected. It's still being scrapped.
*** EDIT ***
*** EDIT ***
The code should be gone now.
*** EDIT ***
Please repost/link as appropriate.
Thanks,
your LJ advisory board rep
Edit 4:
They're doing it again. The script is now at a different url, and the service is using a different domain name so if you're relying on an ad blocker or noscript to block the tracking, you need to add two new entries:outboundlink.mel-stat.livejournal.com/js/pagestats/DR_v4u2.js
- Mood:annoyed

Comments
EDIT: more info here -- http://shatterstripes.livejournal.com/1
Edited at 2010-03-03 10:49 pm (UTC)
Thanks for posting this man!
I wouldn't be surprised if they start editing links to these pages, though...
The domain was registered via GoDaddy, which is all most whois services give you. But BetterWhois shows that the URL was registered by Domains by Proxy, a service that allows you to anonymously register domain names.
WTF, LJ?
*edit: This morning the connection between Outboundlink.net and Domains by Proxy was listed on the WHOIS, and now it's not. Interesting. I wish I'd taken a screen shot.
*edit edit: The info is listed on the WHOIS at GoDaddy. Duhr. :)
Edited at 2010-03-04 09:30 pm (UTC)
And Squidoo is not intended for sharing highly personal content.
On the one hand, I'm appalled, and on the other hand, I'm so not surprised that the web is becoming more and more monetized every day.
Ah, for the good old days of the early internet when making money on the internet was actually ILLEGAL, as it was entirely for sharing information.
Edited at 2010-03-04 07:51 pm (UTC)
FFS.
"There is no such command 'opt_exclude_stats'."
set for communityname opt_exclude_stats 1, according to the No LJ Ads Wiki.I'm not sure it would actually work, though, because for this link re-writing, the setting seems to apply to the user regardless of where they are. IE: I have the opt-out enabled, but if you didn't, you'd still see the links on my journal re-written. I don't see why communities would be any different.
Edited at 2010-03-04 10:47 pm (UTC)
I ask because, when I tried the copy-paste trick on the link you posted, it copied clean and unaltered.
I went ahead and implemented the opt-out all the same though, but I did want to ask folks who were better-tech-headed than I before I boosted the signal and possibly got something wrong.
If I actually click the link in FF, a new tab opens and the redirect shows up in the url before going to the site.
In Chrome, no redirect URL is seen and the site opens in the same tab.
Jeers to LJ for sneaky about this.